Welcome to Gettingwin.Co.,Limited !

News

You are here:Home >> News >> Industry information...

Industry information

Yageo Announces Widespread Price Hikes – What Signals Does It Send?

Time:2026-07-06 Views:242

01 Yageo Price-Hike Timeline: From Targeted Probes to a Full-Scale "Net-Closing"


Yageo’s latest round of price increases did not come out of the blue. Rather, it is the cumulative result of a phased, category‑by‑category rollout that started more than a year ago, moving from its subsidiary brands to the group itself.


Let’s walk through the timeline:


April 2025 – KEMET, a Yageo subsidiary, was the first to act, issuing a price‑hike notice for tantalum capacitors. It announced adjustments on select specifications within its polymer tantalum capacitor product line, effective June 1, marking the opening salvo of this round of increases.


October 2025 – KEMET issued another tantalum‑capacitor price adjustment notice, this time targeting large‑case‑size products, effective November 1. The increases applied to the T520, T521, and T530 series of polymer tantalum capacitors (for case sizes D, V, X, and Y, with voltage ratings from 2.5V to 25V), with hikes ranging from 20% to 30%.


January 2, 2026 – According to Taiwanese media reports, PULSE, Yageo’s magnetic-component brand, sent notices to customers regarding price adjustments on selected ferrite bead products, effective January 1, 2026.


January 16, 2026 – Taiwanese media reported that Yageo itself announced price increases on resistors, effective February 1, with hikes of approximately 15–20%. Affected product series include RC0402, RC0603, RC0805, and RC1206.


Around the same time – Major passive-component distributors in mainland China reportedly began receiving price‑hike notices from Yageo’s subsidiary Kaimei, with adjustments taking effect on January 26. Prices on 0402–1206 thick‑film resistors were raised by 15%.


March 2026 – KEMET again raised its tantalum capacitor quotes, with price adjustments on the T523 series of polymer tantalum capacitors (KO‑CAP) effective April 1.


May 2026 – According to Taiwanese media, KEMET announced yet another price increase on tantalum capacitors and polymer aluminum capacitors, effective June. The overall increase ranges from 5% to 65% across various product lines.


On July 1, 2026, Taiwanese media reported that Yageo had issued price‑adjustment notices to its customers, raising prices on its entire range of capacitor products effective that same day. The increases cover tantalum capacitors, MLCCs, aluminum capacitors, solid‑state aluminum capacitors, film capacitors, supercapacitors, and others – altogether representing approximately 50% of Yageo's total revenue.


Notably, this round of price hikes, for the first time, includes direct customers (EMS/OEMs). According to Yageo’s published data, EMS customers account for 20.4% of revenue, while OEM customers contribute 35%; combined, direct customers make up 55.4% of revenue, representing Yageo’s largest shipment channel. Supply‑chain sources indicate that expanding the price adjustments from distributors to direct customers effectively means that spot prices and contract prices are being raised in tandem.


This price increase not only covers a significant share of revenue but also showcases the full breadth of Yageo’s capacitor product line. The magnitude of the hike varies by customer; notably, MLCCs – which are used in the highest volumes for AI server cabinets – are being adjusted for direct customers for the first time.


Overall, Yageo Group’s price increases have gradually expanded from specific product categories to the full range: starting with KEMET’s tantalum capacitors, then moving to PULSE’s ferrite beads, Yageo’s own resistors, and Kaimei’s resistors, and culminating in this latest round covering the entire capacitor lineup and including direct customers for the first time.


Alongside this series of pricing actions, Yageo’s revenue performance is also worth reviewing.


For the full year 2025, Yageo posted revenue of NT$132.93 billion, up 9.3% year‑over‑year, setting a new historical record. Entering 2026, monthly revenue has continued to post double‑digit year‑over‑year growth: January at 27.13%, February at 17.97%, March at 22.78%, and April at 22.04%. In May, the monthly growth rate surged further to 47.46%, pushing cumulative revenue growth for the year to 27.35%.


02 Why Is Yageo Raising Prices? And Where Does Its Confidence Come From?


Although this price hike is a decision made by Yageo alone, it must be viewed against the broader industry backdrop, as it is closely tied to the global tight supply situation for passive components.


Let’s start with the cost side. This round of increases covers Yageo’s entire range of capacitor products, and the raw‑material cost pressures vary by category: ceramic powders, nickel powder, and silver paste for MLCCs; tantalum metal for tantalum capacitors; aluminum foil and petrochemical materials for aluminum electrolytic and film capacitors – all have continued to rise over the past year. And it is not just Yageo – other manufacturers such as Taiyo Yuden, Walsin, and Fenghua Advanced have also cited mounting raw‑material costs in their previous price‑hike notices.


Industry sources point out that these price adjustments primarily reflect the sustained rise in global manufacturing costs, driven by escalating geopolitical risks, persistently high energy prices, and elevated prices for key raw materials including metals and petrochemicals. Yageo had previously absorbed some of these costs internally through process optimization and supply‑chain integration. However, recent intensifying tensions in the Middle East, greater volatility in international freight rates, and heightened supply‑chain uncertainties have prompted the company to activate its price‑adjustment mechanism.


Turning to the demand side, AI has been the most frequently cited key variable in this cycle. Morgan Stanley conducted a BOM (bill of materials) breakdown of NVIDIA’s next‑generation Rubin platform, and the results show that the MLCC value per rack surges from US$1,530 in the GB300 to US$4,320 in the VR200 – an increase of 182%, ranking second among all components, just behind PCBs. Goldman Sachs has gone so far as to call MLCCs “the next supply bottleneck in the AI supply chain,” estimating that AI server demand for MLCCs will grow by roughly 4.3 times between fiscal years 2025 and 2030, while industry capacity is expanding at an annual rate of just over 10%.


The boost from AI demand is clearly reflected in Yageo’s financial reports and earnings calls.


In the first quarter of 2026, Yageo posted revenue of NT$38.2 billion, up 6.1% sequentially and 22.7% year‑over‑year. Gross margin came in at 38.1%, up 0.8 percentage points from the previous quarter and 2.5 percentage points year‑over‑year; operating margin was 25.2%, up 4.4 percentage points year‑over‑year. All these metrics are at or near multi‑quarter highs.


AI‑related revenue as a share of total revenue rose from roughly 12% in the prior quarter to nearly 14–15%, and the company expects that figure to exceed 15% within the year.


From a product‑mix perspective, in the first quarter, magnetic components led with 25.2% of revenue, followed by tantalum capacitors at 24.3%, resistors at 19.0%, sensors at 13.5%, MLCCs at 13.0%, and others at 5.0%. Compared with the full‑year 2025 figures, tantalum capacitors and magnetic components continued to hold the top two weightings, while the MLCC share narrowed slightly. In its earnings call, the company noted that AI‑related demand serves as a growth driver across multiple product lines, particularly in MLCCs and tantalum capacitors.


By end‑application, industrial accounted for the largest share at 29.0%, followed by computing and enterprise systems at 24.9%, automotive at 17.1%, consumer electronics at 13.0%, telecom and communications at 11.7%, and aerospace/defense/medical at 4.3%. Growth in the computing and communications segments was primarily driven by AI, while the industrial segment has posted five consecutive quarters of growth, indicating that the demand recovery is sustainable. Overall, Yageo’s revenue mix continues to shift toward higher‑value‑added industrial and AI‑computing applications.


In terms of capacity planning, Yageo aims to further increase utilization rates in the second quarter: standard products are expected to rise from 72–74% to about 75%, while specialty products are targeted to climb from 80–82% to roughly 85%. The latter remains at an elevated level, reflecting the continued tight supply‑demand balance in the high‑end product segment.


Entering April and May, Yageo’s growth momentum continued to accelerate.


April consolidated revenue came in at NT$14.039 billion, up 3% month‑over‑month and 22% year‑over‑year, setting a new monthly record at the time, with AI customer pull‑ins serving as the primary driver. Despite fewer working days in May due to the Golden Week holiday, AI‑related application demand remained robust, with both standard and specialty products growing in tandem. Revenue further broke through to NT$15.058 billion, another all‑time high, representing a 7.3% sequential increase and a 47.5% year‑over‑year surge.


03 Conclusion


Since the “shipment halts and quotation suspensions” that began in late May, the spot market for passive components has quickly heated up. A month has passed, and the fervor has yet to cool down significantly. Prices for MLCCs, tantalum capacitors, and other categories continue to rise, but quotations, supply availability, and transaction rhythms remain in a rather frenzied state.


Amid all this excitement, experiences vary from one participant to another: high‑capacitance MLCC prices are more resilient, while low‑capacitance ones are more active but less stable; some customers are accepting the price hikes, while others have started to wait and see; some suppliers are shipping more, while others feel that business has actually become tougher.


So, will Yageo’s full‑range capacitor price hike usher passive components into a genuine upward pricing cycle, or is it merely an emotional spike driven by a phase‑specific supply‑demand mismatch? These questions still require ongoing observation.